Activists of the Folkish Resistance Movement recently conducted a banner drop in Queen Creek, Arizona. The banner comes in light of recent events, with violent left-wing mobs staging riots across the country, and is meant to signify to the world our position on the matter.
The activists conducted themselves greatly, despite the police presence which appeared on the scene only minutes after the banner was displayed.
The lying press has taken to a false narrative that our activists were arrested for the crime of expressing their beliefs, but this is not true.
The banner activity went well, and the activists were only cited for trespassing after a simple misunderstanding that the bridge did not actually belong to the town, but rather belonged to the local railway company.
The activists made clear that they were there only to express their freedom of speech, and had only wished to relay the organization’s message to the local residents. Everything was kept peaceful and after it was over the activists were free to leave. They concluded the day’s events by having a bite to eat.
Excerpts from Dieter Schwarz, Freemasonry: Ideology, Organization and Policy (Berlin: Central Publishing House of the NSDAP, 1944)
Freemasonry is an ideological form of hostility to National Socialism, the significance of which, in the historical development of the past two centuries, must be deemed comparable to the effects of other supranational organizations, the political churches, World Jewry, and Marxism. In its present form, it must be viewed as the bourgeois-liberal advance troops of World Jewry.
It corrupts the principles of all forms of government based on racial and folkish considerations, enables the Jews to achieve social and political equality, and paves the way for Jewish radicalism through its support of the principles of freedom, equality, and brotherhood, the solidarity of peoples, the League of Nations and pacifism, and the rejection of all racial differences.
With the help of its international connections and entanglements, Freemasonry interferes in the foreign policy relationships of all peoples, and pursues, through governmental leaders, secret foreign and world policies which escape the control of those in government.
Through its personal influences and economic favoritism, Freemasonry ensures that all dominant positions of the public, economic, and cultural life of a people are filled with lodge brethren, who in fact translate the concepts of Freemasonry into action.
The National Socialist state has destroyed the organizations of Freemasonry in Germany, and has likewise given rise to similar measures in a number of European states during the present war. But the liberal, Masonic body of thought lives on in the former lodge brethren. In addition, there is still a danger of a renewed penetration of Masonic ideas through the lodge organizations of states in which Freemasons remain free to pursue their objectives without hindrance.
Thus, researching this enemy, and providing a basic education for all racial comrades on the topic of Freemasonry, is not just a matter of expounding upon interest historical problems, rather it is an urgent duty of alertness in the struggle against our enemy.
Freemasonry is tightly allied with Jewry, and not just through its organization. Even the symbolism of Freemasonry through its customs, and to Hebrew through its words and signs, as its real origin. The Mason conceptual universe is a reflection of Jewish near-Eastern images and concepts.
The central point of Old Testament thought is represented by the concept of Yahweh as the Jewish “God”. Initially, the belief in many national deities prevailed among the Jews, for whom Yahweh was still an entirely insignificant desert god, until he sought out a “people” (the nomadic tribe of Israel) with whose help he could set about to dethrone all other gods and achieve world domination. In later Jewry, Yahweh was conceived of first as a High God, then as the One God; but his original nature was strictly retrained. To Jewry, the name of “Yahweh” implies a programme of world enslavement (see Isaiah chapter 60, etc).
With the development of the concept of Yahweh, the centralization of the Jewish religious cult was complete. Instead of the original numerous places of sacrifice in Canaan, a single one appeared: first Shilo (later Jerusalem); then the Royal Tent <Bundeszelt>, and later, the Temple of Solomon were considered the “House of Yahweh”. Just like Yahweh himself, the Temple became a symbol of Jewish plans for world domination (see Ezekiel, chapters 40-48; see also the New Testament, Revelation of St. John, chapter 21).
In the period after the Babylonian Captivity, “Prophetic Jewry” was supplemented by the priestly “Teachings of the Law” (Torah) and the “Books of Wisdom” (Chokmah). “Bourgeois decency” and social order were derived through heavy borrowings from neighbouring cultures, while Yahweh was given a cosmic characterization as the “World Master Builder”. At the same time, the way was paved for internationalistic attitudes (spreading Messianic teachings).
The spiritual attitudes of the Syrio-Phoenician “mysteries” merged with Old Testament thought about the time of the birth of Christ. The mysteries assumed a “feeling of sinfulness”: an inwardly torn human being to whom “divine mercy” was to be granted through mystical, that is, secret words, signs, and rituals, thereby achieving “salvation” and personal “eternal bliss”. All “evil” was attributed to the “Devil” (dualism). These concepts, sometimes depicted with great descriptive power, were reflected in the Jewish “Apocrypha” and New Testament texts around the time of the birth of Christ, as well as in the “Gnostic” writings of the following period.
This whole conceptual world was given a new lease on life through the symbolism and teachings of Freemasonry. The legend of Hiram, the symbol of the Temple with its religious strictures, the testing of courage upon acceptance into the lodge, the symbolic death ritual, the secret signs of recognition, embody in a perceptible, visual manner that which is later revealed in their teachings (the shaping of men from a rough stone into a cube, the building of a “Temple of Humanity”, the “Messianic”, “Empire of Peace” and of “World Brotherhood”, the rejection of all natural racial and political barriers in “World Brotherhood”). The symbols and teachings are, however, not uniformly developed based on definite original forms, but exhibit a colourful mixture of ingredients of the widest variety of types (syncretism), which makes it much more difficult to prove their origin in any particular case.
This Near Eastern conceptual world was first communicated to the entire West through the Church, which loyally guarded its Jewish “heritage”. The Arabian influence of Islam beginning in the 7th century, the experiences of the Crusades beginning in the 11th century, as well as the influence of Jewish philosophers (Ibn-Gebirol, Maimonides, the Cabbalists) beginning in the 12th century, led to a stronger emphasis on this Jewish-derived conceptual world. Jewish attitudes thus returned to the Western field of vision, whence they had been driven out by German scholasticism.
“Christian Cabbalists” (Pico de Mirandola) acquired particular prestige in the academies and religious associations of the Renaissance.
Scholars occupied themselves primarily with Hebrew texts, in which an eccentric search for “secrets” and bizarre insights may have played a part. These efforts were transmitted to Germany through Johannes Reuchlin and others. Secret societies were formed which attempted to build Jewish fantasies with theological elements into a system through an admixture of alchemy, mathematics, astronomy, and astrology, as well as magic.
The basic concepts of Freemasonry
The most contradictory declarations are made regarding the principles of Freemasonry by lodge organizations and leading Freemasons. One of these basic principles states that “Freemasonry strives to encourage, in a manner reflecting the customs of the early lodges, the moral ennoblement of Man, and human happiness in general”. (Declaration of the “Grand Lodge of Hamburg”. The Freemason Ludwig Schroeder declared:
This declaration concords perfectly with the statements of Reverend Anderson’s “Ancient Duties”. The constitution of the national “Grand Lodge of Prussia, “For Friendship”” states, in paragraph IV of the General Principles:
Thus, the aim is to achieve an international association of humanity beyond race and nationality. Freemasons are proud that Negroes, the yellow races, and Jews are to stand with equal rights next to the White man in this universal chain of brotherhood.
All men are equal in the humanitarian ideal of Freemasonry. The old edition of the “Universal Handbook of Freemasonry” says of this Masonic ideal:
Uninhibited individualism in personal as well as in political and economic relationships is one of the consequences of the Masonic ideology. In the ritual of the 30th degree, it is expressly stated that the aims of the “dictators”, which, of course, would restrict the rights and self-determination of the individual, must be fought. There is no thought of subordinating personal advantages and interests to the good of a community of people.
The right of the individual goes before all else. The manifestations and ideas of bourgeois liberalism are for the most part anchored in Freemasonry. The form of government reflecting Freemasonry is the democratic republic.
Freemasonry and National Socialism
National Socialist leaders on Freemasonry
From the beginning, the National Socialist movement, through its Führer, was aware of the unbridgeable chasm which yawned between it and all currents and groups of Freemasonry. In “Mein Kampf”, the Führer expressed himself on the problem of Freemasonry:
Alfred Rosenberg made fundamental statements on Freemasonry in the “Myth of the Twentieth Century”, accompanied by numerous political texts, newspapers, and newspaper articles (for example, in the periodical founded by him, “The World Struggle”, in the “Völkischer Beobachter”, “The Crime of the Freemasons” (1922) “Freemasonic World Politics in the Light of Critical Research”, etc.)
Where state police measures against German Freemasonry after 1933 are concerned, Reichsmarschall Hermann Goering was decisive in his position as Prussian Minister-President. When the Old Prussian lodges attempted to continue their existence in National Socialist Germany, Goering determined that there was no more room for any kind of Freemasonry.
The fundamentally negative attitude of the NSDAP towards Freemasonry was also expressed by the Supreme Party Judge, Reichsleiter Buch, in many fundamental decisions and decrees.
Expression was repeatedly given to National Socialism’s hostility to Freemasonry in many other writings and texts of leading men of the Party and State.
World Freemasonry’s struggle against National Socialism.
While Freemasonry had proclaimed its hostility to Fascism, and National Socialism even before 1933, an unparalleled struggle campaign of vilification by Freemasonry against National Socialist Germany set in after the Führer’s accession to power.
Jewish and other German emigrants were leading figures in this activity. We need only mention the speaking activities of the Jew Georg Bernhard, the famous publisher of the “Vossischen Zeitung” and the emigrant newspaper “Pariser Tageszeitung”, and the Jew Gumbel, a former professor at Heidelberg, who originated the term – referring to the dead soldiers of the 1914-18 War – “fallen on the field of dishonour”. In the French lodges, these men began a campaign of vilification against National Socialism. At international Masonic congresses, resolutions were taken against National Socialist Germany, some of which were transmitted to the League of Nations. American lodges encouraged the activity of the Anti-Nazi League. The Anschluss of Austria to Germany, the return of the Sudetenland to Germany, and the creation of the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia gave international Freemasonry, which was decisively under French influence, the occasion for wild attacks on the Reich of Adolf Hitler, not to mention Masonic intervention for emigrants from Austria and former Czechoslovakia, who were furnished with emigration papers due to their Masonic connections, in order to liberate them from the “hell of National Socialism”.
North American Freemasons contributed tens of thousands of dollars to the support of Masonic emigrants from central Europe (the distribution was controlled by a special aid committee in Paris). In like manner, considerable sums of money were collected from an astonishing variety of countries and steered to Spanish Freemasonry on the Red side of the Spanish civil war.
The Peoples Front in France was the most visible expression of Freemasonry’s political will: a merger of all elements inclined towards republicanism, democracy, and Marxism, combined with the liberal bourgeoisie. In the Spanish Civil War, French Freemasons demanded the armed intervention of France in favour of the Reds. After the Munich Accords, they demanded war with Germany, at all times in close cooperation with the Freemason President Roosevelt, whose intervention was demanded to prop up the Masonic Peace Treaty of Versailles.
For years before the present war, the international press, closely intertwined with international Freemasonry, stood shoulder to shoulder in the struggle against National Socialist Germany, and the war begun in the fall of 1939 is only the continuation of this struggle by other means.
When Goethe called Freemasonry “a state within a state”, he was entirely correct. No government which intends to carry through its objectives strictly and in a manner compatible with a sense of responsibility, can tolerate Freemasonry, which conducts uncontrollable, anonymous, and therefore unaccountable dealings through its international and personal associations. From within and without, Freemasonry penetrates officialdom, economic organizations, and influential positions in political and spiritual life, etc., a fact which is all the more alarming because every Freemason is obliged to be a Freemason first, even outside the lodge, and to act in accordance with his Masonic training. A Masonic politician, as a lodge proclamation expressly states, must never forget that he is first a Freemason, and only secondly a politician who is responsible to his voters and his people.
The Masonic oath, the duty of obedience and silence, which must be taken before entering the lodge, must be deemed immoral, because it must be taken without any knowledge of the scope of the obligation. How many conflicts such an obligation may entail, can never be calculated.
By contrast, National Socialism stands for unconditional duty and responsibility.
The world view of National Socialism is Nordic; that of the Freemason is Asiatic Jewish. The National Socialistic position is racially conscious; that of the lodges, anti racial and pro-Jewish.
The communality of National Socialism is the living feature of racially related types, the racial community, not the caste system and clique of interests of the bourgeoisie organized in the lodges.
National Socialism contrasts an unconditional racial nationalism against the cosmopolitan internationalism of Freemasonry.
The orientation of the German people according to the basic concepts of National Socialism stands in stark contrast to Masonic “teaching methods” and “educational systems”, with their racially foreign symbols and Jewish temple service.
It was therefore indispensable to smash all Masonic organizations in Germany, and to eliminate the possibility of Masonic influence in the broadest possible manner.
Link by link, the Führer’s policies in Europe have broken the confines of the Masonic “world chain”. Following the dissolution of the lodges in Germany, the Masonic organizations in former Austria were next to be eliminated. In the national territory of former Czechoslovakia, the lodges dissolved themselves on the grounds of caution. In former Poland, they have been compelled to give way before the strength of anti-Masonic forces. In Norway, Belgium, and Luxembourg, the lodges were dissolved only after the occupation by German troops. In France, the government recognized, in Freemasonry, one of the parties jointly guilty for the defeat of France, and prohibited Masonic activity; Masonic personal influence was also eliminated by corresponding laws. The events of the war in Southeastern Europe have paralyzed the activities of Freemasonry in major areas, so that Masonry is now represented in a few European countries only. Apart from Denmark and Sweden, it works chiefly out of Switzerland. Outside the European continent, Freemasonry still enjoys a position of unweakened power in Grand Britain, and particularly in North America, where it has been decisive in steering political opinion against National Socialism’s New Order in Europe.
In their last bastions, Freemasons work together with the other enemies of National Socialism, with World Jewry, the political churches, and international Marxism.
All German racial comrades must recognize the dangers of the liberalistic Masonic body of thought. Any attempt to reintroduce Masonic thoughts and symbolism, in whatever form or appearance, ever again in German literature, in German art and science, or in political concepts, must be nipped in the bud.
We learn from history that Freemasonry has been forbidden many times, and in many different states; yet it fell upon the peoples again and again, in times of crisis, like a poison of corruption.
The present text is intended to contribute towards protecting the German people from such a fate.
“It is time today to expose some of this nonsense that has accompanied the National Socialist revolution to the full light of day, to examine it without pity. That is even more necessary, since otherwise some of this nonsense over time may gradually corrupt the style and nature of our revolution, leaving to posterity an image of our nature and goals that in no way corresponds to National Socialist convictions and views. Certainly there is need for public regulation of the great moral foundations of our national life. However, some nonsense is also spreading that attempts to reach beyond that to establish a code for the purely personal conduct of individuals. That leads eventually to a moralism that is everything other than National Socialist.”
Joseph Goebbels, “More Morality, Less Moralism”, 1934
Morals are the soil in which any functioning social body is rooted. They are required at every level of organization from the individual to the broadest levels of human relations. A person without morals is a self-serving entity who would be cast aside by any healthy community and, a society without morals is like a ship without a rudder that goes wherever the winds take it. All National Socialists will agree that most people today have lost all sense of morality and as a result have become slaves to base desires and blind to the degenerate conditions which are imposed by those equally bankrupt persons above.
However, it is also possible for us to become too moralistic among ourselves to the point of self-harm. Therefore, it is best to tackle this recurring issue of moral purity spiraling within our movement before it rears its ugly head.
A term that is often tossed around in our spaces is “straight edge”. Someone who is straight edge does not – even in moderation – smoke, drink, enjoy sweets, bathe with hot water etc. etc. etc. These warriors of moralism continue to sharpen their blades until they become so sharp that they cut themselves and their communities’ and bleed both bodies dry of all joy.
They would wield National Socialism like a whip as opposed to the compass that it is supposed to be. Should this contest of morality go unchecked the afflicted group would become impotent and fragment and this fragmentation would surely spell the death for our race.
“To take joy and pleasure from a people means to make it unfit for its struggle for its daily bread.”
National Socialism’s prime goal is to lift our folk community to ever greater heights and to maintain the fire of our Aryan spirit for life. It is supposed to enable us to share the little everyday pleasures with our kin and to use them as fuel for our endless journey into the unknown. A joyous people is filled with the desire to take on new challenges and is equipped with the tools to stand against those who would block their path.
Of course we must be careful not to become decadent and indulge in indecent acts such as sexual perversion, hard drugs, endless revelry and the like, but we must also allow ourselves to stop and enjoy the treasures which fate has provided us. National Socialism is an all-encompassing worldview and it would be wrong to use it as a means to stop people from truly taking part in the world.
Indeed it is not the one who fills volumes with moral regulations that is the real National Socialist, but it is the one who appreciates and affirms a healthy life that is shared with their folk.
On May 10, 2020, Tommie Lindh was brutally murdered by a Sudanese invader named Abubaker Mohamad whom had tried to rape a young girl. In his efforts to stop the foreign invader from committing this heinous crime, he was stabbed in the process. While Tommie laid incapacitated, the young girl was raped. The knife wound turned out to be fatal, and Tommie lost his life at the young age of 19.
His friends told Nordfront.se that Tommie was an optimist who still saw a great future for his people and loved them very much. He was a positive force on those who were around him and serves an example to those here in America and across the world. In Härnösand, Sweden a memorial service was held to honor his life.
His death reverberates throughout the entirety of the Aryan world, and it has brought us all closer together. From America to Greece his name echoes as many mourn the death of a young man who sacrificed himself bravely in the face of a heartless attacker.
While Abubaker’s crimes are despicable, blame is to be found not only in him but in those who welcomed him here in the first place. Those who chant for open borders, “equality”, and racial justice. Those with their false kindness, who welcome these rapists and murderers into our nations, without any regard for their own people. It is this false sense of compassion that enables this senseless murder and violence of the young members of our Folk.
Let his death be the rallying cry of a new era. Let it light a fire within you so that it may bring you the strength to fight so that such actions may never take place again. Let his name be etched into your very soul never to be forgotten, and to always count him among the fallen heroes who sacrificed themselves bravely for their people. May the victims find peace and eternal rest as we struggle to ensure that those who commit such actions and those who enable them are held directly responsible and brought to justice.
A false radicalism haunts men’s minds. Being radical and revolutionary only means for them to tear down. Whether and how something can replace what’s torn down was known least of all by those who behaved the most radical. Their radicalism was hate, rage and negation. Wild narrow-mindedness acts like sub-humanity. If it takes control, it foams with “radicalism”. We Hitler soldiers have nothing to do with such radicalism. Nonetheless, we must be radical. Radicalism is good, if it includes affirmation. We do not rant and rage against things that we don’t like and which aren’t appropriate for us. Otherwise we would only rant and rave, but we would not be radical. Getting to the root of the problem, combating it with determination so that bad developments are avoided, to us that means being radical.
– Alfred Kotz, Führen und Folgen
If you have spent enough time in National Socialist circles either online or offline you have no doubt encountered at least one False Radical. These people can most easily be identified by their frequent calls for and praise of senseless violence, skull masks and, most notably, their failure to act on their own “advice”. These types of people are not new or exclusive to our modern era but have in fact been around since before Adolf Hitler fought his heroic struggle against world Jewry. False Radicals justify their own meaningless existence with the excuse that there needs to exist some sort of boogeyman to scare our enemies into accepting some vague “universal truth” though they themselves would be hard pressed to tell you what that truth is. They are not only a nuisance but they are also useful tools for our enemies. Their existence only enables the Jew to paint us true National Socialists as blood thirsty animals.
The best way of dealing with False Radicals is exposing them wherever they are found, calling them out and forcing them back into the shadows where they can wallow among themselves. More importantly one must also make sure that they live as Adolf Hitler commands. In order to truly defeat False Radicals one must first look inward and destroy the falseness within oneself at the root and become a True Radical.
To be a True Radical means to live honourably, simply and, to set an example for others in your work both in private and in public. If we do away with half measures and delays and act as our Eternal Leader requires then the rot of False Radicalism can be torn out. One must remember this truth day after day and recommit themselves to it in order to stand against the Jewish tide. A community of true and loyal individuals carries the materials which will build a new age for our Folk and cast our racial enemies into irrelevance.
In honor of the first of May, activists from the Folkish Resistance Movement conducted a banner drop in Mesa, Arizona on Friday.
The banner which states, “Resist Invasion, End Immigration,” was meant to protest the nation’s weak borders and open immigration policies which work against the interests of America’s families and workers.
Activists in other parts of the nation also took part in some activism of their own in solidarity with the banner drop and in the weeks prior to the day, posting propaganda material in many other states.
This past weekend I went to an expo at the design museum in Den Bosch, Netherlands. For the past few months they have had an expo about art and design within the Third Reich. This expo was the first one to ever be done about this subject.
When the museum had announced the expo it created a lot of controversy. People were scared that it would glorify the “evil Nazi ideology”. The controversy was so extreme that even international mainstream media new sources reported on it. The museum put some special measures into effect, banning photographs, allowing only 50 people into the exhibit at once, and requiring people to reserve tickets online upfront.
“From the start we explain that this was a racist ideology and that the party’s aim was to establish a racist volk culture. The exhibition has the feel of a documentary.”
Timo de Rijk, director of the museum
All this made me want to visit myself to see what the fuzz was all about, and so I did. However, I was very surprised to see how overblown all the controversy surrounding it was when I did visit.
Where I was expecting to find a couple of halls and rooms filled with exhibits I found only two rooms, one of which was used to play a propaganda movie about how the “evil Nazis brainwashed the Germans”. This movie was meant to give people the appropriate reactions to what was visible in the expo, thus keeping the independent thought levels to a minimum.
After trying to watch the short movie for a couple of minutes, I gave up and decided to go see the actual expo, thus being ahead of the crowd. When I entered I instantly recognized the museum’s efforts to make everything look as bleak as possible, despite the magnificence of the exhibits.
When walking around the expo I felt watched the entire time by the museum employees. These employees had been hired to watch over everyone to make sure no one broke any of the rules.
There were some very beautiful and imposing pieces featured in the expo, but I soon realized that a big portion of the expo was not dedicated to the art and design of the Third Reich, but to the Holocaust (in case we somehow forgot about what happened and how very important it is).
Taking my time to take in all of value which was available to me, I found the amount of exhibits lacking, and decided I would try to sneak some pictures before I left, as very little pictures are available online. I waited till no one was watching me and took a couple of pictures for myself. However, on the third picture I was caught and was asked to stop taking pictures and delete the ones I already got in front of the “guard.” I complied and “deleted” the pictures, then decided I had my fill of the expo and left.
The amount of effort put into trying to demonize National Socialism and its art was shocking even to someone who is quite used to it. But, what was worse was the obvious trouble they had gone through in doing it. The material showed the Third Reich as a magnificent state which had striven toward beauty and unity in nature. Had they not put in so much effort trying to denounce all of it, I think many people might have left the expo asking themselves whether if “Nazism” was really so bad after all.
If I were to summarize my thoughts about this expo, I would say it showed clearly the fear we still instill in the people ruling our world. The constant necessity to try and demonize us in every way possible only shows the strength of our worldview.
This past Saturday 15th, I had the pleasure of participating at the Dresden remembrance march. It was the 75th anniversary of the terrible war crime committed on the city of Dresden.
The remembrance was done to honor those that died in the firebombing of the city by American and British Air force pilots. The city was chosen not because of any military targets, but simply to instill fear within the German people. The city was the Reich’s backup capital in case Berlin would fall, and was currently harboring real refugees who had fled the communist menace approaching from the east.
While there was also a memorial march held on Friday the 14th, it was one condemning the actions of the Third Reich, and blaming them for the firebombings which lay waste to the beautiful city.
The march held on Saturday however, was one held by various nationalist groups, who support the Germans as the heroes they are instead of carrying the nonsensical burden of shame with them.
The march was not just meant to remember the lost, but also to show the world that they were not forgotten, and that the spirit of National Socialism is not dead and will never die.
And it was very much alive that day, as over 1.000 people from all over Europe showed up to march and grief together.
On the other side, 2.500 left wing groups, Communists and Antifa had organized to try and disrupt the march. The march itself was marked by crazy leftists shouting offensive slogans (like “Bomber Harris do it again”), blowing whistles, blocking the roads and trying to make as much noise as possible to disrupt the speeches and moments of silence being held to remember the dead.
While they certainly tried hard, the Nationalist spirit held vast and people were unshaken. While the leftists got dragged away by police and put in the back of the vans, not one of the people marching for Dresden was arrested. Quite the contrary, not one response was given all day. Not even a middle finger or offensive sign, only smiles or disapproving stares.
Standing in remembrance of the dead was a powerful moment for me. The constant shouting by left wing scum did not make us feel ashamed but proud. The march left upon me the impression of a youth, waking up to the nationalist spirit once again. From the ashes of the burned down city the spirit will rise like a phoenix, filling others with pride for their race and showing that it is here to stay.
On Saturday 21st December, activists handed out food and water to the homeless and other locals in the spirit of Yule.
Sandwiches were prepared as activists gathered with each other and discussed the local outreach which was to take place. After the conclusion of the social activity the attendants met at a local Biergarten to celebrate the success of the outreach and take part in the holiday cheer.
The group was well received by the locals on the street and most of the food was eagerly accepted. Locals shared their struggles while members listened to them express their concerns about the future and what it may hold for them. It is clear from the reception by the locals and the state of the city’s increasing homeless population just how desperate the situation really is.